Hundreds of thousands of Texans Reside in Counties With out Hazard Mitigation Plan – Cyber Tech

LUFKIN — Greater than 100 Texas counties shouldn’t have a hazard mitigation plan, federal information exhibits, slicing off entry to billions in non-emergency grants to assist rebuild infrastructure after pure disasters.

Of 254 counties within the state, 103 counties lack plans accredited by the Federal Emergency Administration Company. Most of those are rural, with fewer than 50,000 residents, a Texas Tribune evaluation of federal information discovered. A complete of three.5 million Texans — or about 12% of the state’s inhabitants — dwell in a county with out a plan.

On common, counties with no hazard mitigation plan have a inhabitants of 34,315 individuals, roughly one fifth the inhabitants of counties with an accredited plan. Most counties with out a plan stretch from the Panhandle by means of West Texas and right down to Rio Grande Valley.

Among the many most populated counties with no plans are Midland and Ector counties, which anchor the state’s oil-rich Permian Basin. Officers in each counties instructed the Tribune they have been working to submit plans for overview.

This shall be Midland County’s first hazard mitigation plan, county officers mentioned. The county obtained an $88,000 grant to jot down its plan, work that’s anticipated to take as much as two years.

In neighboring Ector County, Emergency Administration Coordinator James Wes Carta mentioned the method to develop an up to date plan calls for cooperation from metropolis officers, first responders and the general public — a time consuming endeavor that would take greater than a 12 months.

“We wish an correct, life like plan,” Carta mentioned. “What do they see as being the problems that we will tackle by means of this hazard mitigation plan? Is it upgrading our constructing codes to assist our buildings be extra resilient for tornadoes or extreme climate? Is it the flooding? Is it fireplace? It turns into very daunting.”

With out such plans, these communities are precluded from federal catastrophe preparation funding, additional broadening the hole in infrastructure growth between city and rural communities. As these communities shrink, they face rising hurdles to rebuild and put together for the long run.

These plans sometimes present an evaluation of dangers from hurricanes, tornadoes, floods and wildfires. A plan can embody, for instance, an estimate of what number of buildings are susceptible to flooding and the way a lot it will take to wash up a flood. The plan additionally lays out objectives for native governments to avoid wasting lives and property. One such goal might be to create cooling facilities throughout instances of utmost warmth. One other may be updating zoning insurance policies to make sure buildings can stand up to a stronger earthquake.

Finally, the plan can assist communities put together for and get better sooner from any sort of catastrophe.

“When performed accurately, a hazard mitigation plan can assist the group get behind tasks and prioritize them, in addition to assist the group mirror on the dangers they’ve and attempt to do one thing about them,” mentioned Kristin Smith, a lead researcher for Headwaters Economics, a Montana-based nonprofit that helps communities with land administration.

However growing a complete plan is time-consuming and costly, mentioned Polk County Decide Sydney Murphy.

Lengthy-term catastrophe and aid planning can typically fail to make a listing of high priorities when a small group with few assets can be trying to unravel on a regular basis issues.

Polk, inhabitants 53,255, is considered one of 14 East Texas counties with out a hazard mitigation plan. Its five-year plan, which additionally covers Trinity County, expired in February, months earlier than the county was drenched by rain storms that triggered widespread flooding. It’s the primary time Murphy is conscious the county failed to satisfy its deadline.

On this case, Murphy mentioned, a scarcity of funding prevented the work from being performed. Nonetheless, simply this week, the county agreed to pay a consulting agency $100,000 to finish its plan.

This 12 months’s flooding was the largest emergency administration state of affairs the county has dealt with, Murphy mentioned, however the 2018 plan “nonetheless held true.”

As pure disasters have turn out to be extra frequent, many rural counties face a shrinking tax base and rising inflation, stretching small budgets and making exterior assist extra important.

Recognizing the shortfalls inside her personal price range, Murphy and her emergency coordinator, Courtney Comstock, utilized for grants to cowl the price of updating the hazard mitigation plan two years in the past. They have been denied the cash at each step.

It takes money and time to replace a plan, which calls for granular particulars, equivalent to the price of gas to combat a wildfire.

“It’s not simply the analysis,” Murphy mentioned. “It’s the legwork. It’s compiling all the data and ensuring the insurance policies all line up so that you don’t have contradictory data within the totally different sections. It’s every part. It’s plenty of work.”

Polk County’s now expired plan fills a 5-inch three-ring binder with no house so as to add the rest, Murphy mentioned.

The quantity of money and time relies on the variety of communities and teams concerned, in addition to whether or not residents take part within the replace. If the group is rewriting a complete plan, wants assist with funding or faces pure disasters through the planning course of, it might take even longer.

“$100,000 is some huge cash out of my price range for a rural space,” Murphy mentioned. “I additionally cowl Trinity County with my hazard mitigation plan. So who’s going to pay? I can’t cut up it 50/50 as a result of my inhabitants is a complete lot larger than theirs is.”

Trinity County’s inhabitants is 14,000.

The county tax base simply doesn’t cowl every part it must, Murphy mentioned.

To make up the distinction, counties typically search grants to pay for the employees and analysis to supply the plans. Nonetheless, rural counties throughout the U.S. additionally face vital obstacles to making use of for the required state and federal support to cowl the pricey technique of updating a hazard mitigation plan, mentioned Jennifer Horney, a College of Delaware professor and former affiliate professor at Texas A&M the place she additionally engaged in hazard mitigation and group resilience work.

The most important barrier is the work to jot down, submit and follow-up on grant purposes, she mentioned. Many small, rural governments are quick staffed with individuals doing a number of jobs, which units them at an obstacle to their city counterparts who could have a complete workforce devoted to grant administration.

“Texas particularly has a really weak native planning construction,” Horney mentioned. “So you find yourself having just a few individuals in a rural group who put on plenty of hats — they’re unlikely to have a full-time individual devoted to one thing like resilience and even restoration.”

After they do apply, there isn’t a assure if or when the money will arrive.

One county north of Polk, Angelina County had a plan that expired in April. The county is working with Lufkin metropolis officers to submit an up to date hazard mitigation plan now.

Each entities paid $10,000 every at the beginning of the method to replace the plan and at the moment are in search of further grant funding for the opposite Angelina County entities. Emergency administration coordinator Ricky Connor mentioned the grant course of takes time and is awaiting each state and federal approval.

Connor expects the entire value to replace the plan to be round $100,000 with roughly $80,000 coming from grants.

The county spent a number of months working with group leaders and small enterprise house owners, accepting group enter and coordinating with an knowledgeable within the area of emergency administration. However Angelina County hasn’t confronted the identical obstacles as its southern neighbor. The flooding that overwhelmed Livingston for weeks, was felt solely briefly in Lufkin.

Since Murphy was elected Polk County decide, the county’s high govt that additionally has broad emergency powers, there have been historic tornadoes, winter freezes, the COVID-19 pandemic and flooding.

“I’m simply uninterested in it,” Murphy mentioned.

And each time one thing hits her county, Murphy sees the agricultural communities inside it sliding additional again. Examples embody the lack of paved roadways and the additional degradation of houses within the space.

FEMA distributes funding based mostly on a cost-benefit evaluation which helps the company to prioritize tasks and guarantee cash is nicely spent, mentioned Smith, the nonprofit govt who helps native governments plan for hazards. However the system relies extensively on property values, that are going to be greater in large cities in comparison with rural areas, making a system that tilts towards less-populated counties.

It’s simpler for a rich neighborhood in Houston to show the worth of a hazard mitigation undertaking than it’s for small neighborhoods simply south of the Lake Livingston Dam, the place lives have been upended when the floodgates have been launched.

“When you have a undertaking that’s going to guard a neighborhood that may be very rich with plenty of very costly houses, you’re going to have plenty of advantages from that. You’re going to avoid wasting thousands and thousands of {dollars} in prevented prices from a flood,” Smith mentioned. “On the flip aspect, in case you have a bunch of houses in a neighborhood which might be perhaps cell houses, or are decrease property worth houses, the advantages of defending them are simply going to be decrease.”

Murphy mentioned she is glad the county took steps this week to maneuver Polk’s plan ahead, and mentioned she plans to make use of information she and Comstock collected over the past two years in preparation for this level.

She hopes to submit the county’s plan later this 12 months.

— Carlos Nogueras Ramos contributed.

This text initially appeared in The Texas Tribune at

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and interesting Texans on state politics and coverage. Study extra at texastribune.org.

Photograph: Hurricane Harvey Large Flooding Columbus Texas small City destruction shut up